Health Standards

Healthcare & Technology Resources

  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • #HITsm Chat
  • About
  • Authors

Key Differences Between HL7 V2 and V3

December 12, 2007 By David Li 4 Comments

In the HL7 Standard, there are two versions that people think of – Version 2 (V2) and Version 3 (V3). Outlined below are some of the differences between V2 and V3.

HL7 V2

  • Not “Plug and Play” – it provides 80 percent of the interface and a framework to negotiate the remaining 20 percent on an interface-by-interface basis
  • Historically built in an ad hoc way because no other standard existed at the time
  • Generally provides compatibility between 2.X versions
  • Messaging-based standard built upon pipe and hat encoding
  • In the U.S., V2 is what most people think of when people say “HL7”

HL7 V3

  • Approaching “Plug and Play” – less of a “framework for negotiation”
  • Many decades of effort over ten year period reflecting “best and brightest” thinking
  • NOT backward compatible with V2
  • Model-based standard built upon Reference Information Model (RIM) provides consistency across entire standard
  • In the U.S., when Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) is what most people in the U.S. think of when people say “HL7 V3”

Learn more about preparing for HL7 V3 or more about the HL7 standards, including HL7 V3, through an in-depth white paper entitled The Evolution of HL7 (PDF).

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts

David Li

David Li is an Implementations Consultant at Corepoint Health. Prior to Corepoint Health, David served as a Business Analyst Specialist with The Trizetto Group assisting payers with development of their member, provider, and consumer portals. Additionally, he has assisted many hospitals with numerous interfaces as a software engineer for a healthcare applications solutions provider.

Latest posts by David Li (see all)

  • Key Differences Between HL7 V2 and V3 - December 12, 2007
  • Preparing for HL7 V3 - October 10, 2007
  • ORM vs. RDE for HL7 Pharmacy Orders - July 2, 2007

Filed Under: CDA, HL7 Standard, HL7 Standards

  • Pingback: What If There Was an Election on Healthcare Standards?()

  • Pingback: CDA - The American Bridge from HL7 V2.X to V3?()

  • Pingback: Does XML and/or UML Solve All of Our Healthcare Integration Issues? | HL7 Standards()

  • Pingback: Which HL7 Version Do You Encounter the Most in Your Interfacing Projects? | HL7 Standards()

HL7 FHIR Resources

HL7 FHIR Resources

Connect

  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
Tweets by @HealthStandards

#HITSM Chat

[#HITsm chat 11.18.16] Celebrate Passing the #HITsm Torch

November 15, 2016

Moderated by Chad Johnson, @OchoTex, HealthStandards.com Editor and Corepoint Health Senior Marketing Manager. November 18th will be the last #HITsm chat under @HealthStandards. Celebrate ‘Passing the #HITsm torch’ to @techguy @HealthcareScene.

Passing the #HITsm torch

November 10, 2016

The first #HITsm tweet chat was held almost six years ago on Jan 10, 2011. Since that time, we have hosted approximately 280 #HITsm chats. While some of you may have participated in that very first chat (only 15 actually participated), I’m proud to say that the chats and the community have continued to grow […]

View More #HITSM Chat >

Podcasts

‘Hactivist’ Fred Trotter on the Cancer Moonshot, open source data in healthcare, and more

August 3, 2016

Artificial intelligence is a topic that isn’t going away in the health IT and medical community. One reason it’s come as far as it has is thanks to open sourcing, or shared data. Today’s guest, Fred Trotter, has a lot to say about the Vice President’s Cancer Moonshot initiative – which he was recognized for […]

Sue Schade on gender equality, CIO challenges, and value-based healthcare

July 27, 2016

View More Podcasts >

Copyright © 2021 Health Standards. All Rights Reserved.